The blog is meant for several reasons. Here several issues will be discussed regarding welfare, excellence and comments over what is really going wrong.
July 19, 2010
Mumbai. McKinsey and Company, the global leaders in management consultancy services, have proposed a new framework for companies dealing with employee unrest arising out of unfriendly and unpopular business decisions. The framework, published in the visitor edition of The McKinsey Quarterly, advocates a four-pronged strategy called FART to deal with the dissatisfaction among employees if and when they fail to appreciate prudent business decisions like cost-cutting measures.
FART stands for Feed, Affect, Relegate, and Terminate – four different approaches that a company should take based on mix of two parameters – existing ‘Employee Mindset’ and the ‘Cash Status’ of the company. The McKinsey Quarterly report elaborates each of these four approaches of the FART framework with several exhibits to back up the study.

The visual representation of the framework has been called McFart, but this could potentially cause a legal battle over copyright between McKinsey and McDonalds
“If the company has a bit of cash and the employees’ mindset is still to turn hostile, the company should ‘feed’ the employees to stop them from turning hostile. The best way to ‘feed’ is to give some freebies like season gifts, personalized cakes on birthdays, shopping coupons, free pizzas during working hours, etc.” the report explained the ‘feed’ approach of the FART framework.
In case employees’ mood has turned a bit hostile and some of them are demanding explanations about issues such as scrapping of bonuses and other benefits, the FART framework suggests ‘affect’ approach for companies with surplus cash. ‘Affect’ approach requires the company to affect i.e. pretend taking some proactive steps for employee welfare.
“The company could initiate a pretentious performance appraisal process to quell the employee unrest. Other steps could involve sending the employees a feedback form, or inviting employees for a one-to-one interview with HR executives, etc. Such steps mollify the hostile mood of the employees, giving them a hope about future, but these steps should be taken only when the company has some cash to meet the expenses associated with these affected steps.” the report elaborated.
If a company doesn’t enjoy the luxury of surplus cash and is running into losses, the FART framework advocates ‘relegate’ approach, but only if the employees are in a friendly mindset, which is rare in normal course. The approach involves taking steps like lowering the compensation packages and demoting the employees. The report describes the ‘relegate’ approach as being a transient approach as it usually ends up changing the employee mindset from friendly to hostile, leaving the company to adopt the forth and the final approach – terminate.
“If the company is running into losses and employees have turned hostile, the best approach is to ‘terminate’ i.e. fire the employees.” the report concluded the FART framework, which has been well received by various HR professionals across companies.
New Delhi. Amidst demand by many politicians cutting across party lines, the Congress party announced on Thursday that it planned to introduce a special symbol to denote corruption in the next few weeks. The introduction of the new Rupee Symbol had reportedly created a huge problem for the ruling party as several mails asking for introduction of a Corruption Symbol reached them today.
“Yes, there have been several queries asking if the rupee symbol was applicable to black money also. The politicians, who have been taking money through international accounts, feel that instead of having different symbols, all their black wealth should be incorporated under one symbol, making the transactions easier.” said Congress spokesperson Manish Tewary.
Ambika Soni, Minister for Information and Broadcasting completely agrees. “The new symbol for corruption will show the world that India is a force to be reckoned with. This will make Indian economy comparable to the whole European economy. The new Rupee Symbol could act as the Euro symbol, while this proposed Corruption Symbol could be akin to a European country’s original domestic currency symbol, to be phased out in due time.” she said.

An NGO called 5th Pillar had introduced zero-rupee note as the symbol for corruption, but it failed to get official recognition from the government
But the statement by Ms. Soni could trigger demands by various regional parties to introduce special symbols in their respective states as the new rupee symbol has “ra” in Hindi i.e. devanagari script. MNS and Shiv Sena are already reported to be asking for Marathi symbols, something that has worried the UPA government.
Sources within the government have informed us that the Prime Minister was still clueless about the whole issue and was waiting to be briefed by Sonia Gandhi before taking any decision. It is also rumored that a Group of Ministers could be formed to discuss the issue further.
But the civil society has received the proposal enthusiastically with “Corruption Symbol” trending worldwide on Twitter and everyone coming up with ideas and suggestions for the government. Serial commentator Suhel Seth too joined the debate and suggested a symbol for the same.
“I think it is a great step for India” he said, further tweeting “the symbol for corruption can be an Open Palm holding a Lotus, signifying the unity and participation of all parties in this matter.”, which was immediately re-tweeted by his friends Lalit Modi and Vijay Mallya.
“Why waste the valuable time of the hard working IITians? Let’s adopt this symbol!” he added.
Meanwhile, in a completely unrelated development, fresh violence was reported in the Naxal hit areas due to the inability of the Congress to include the Maoists in the ongoing discussion on the Corruption Symbol.
News
|
